I’ve been wondering whether this could make sense as an extension of Galaxy. I know Galaxy has been moving more of its infrastructure to bare metal with Galaxy Metal, and I completely understand that object storage and transactional email are very different businesses from operating application containers or databases So I’m not suggesting that Meteor should necessarily build and operate its own S3 or email infrastructure . What I’m wondering is whether it would make sense to expose those services through Galaxy , even if AWS or another provider remains behind the scenes.