Background Even a highly accurate diagnostic test can yield more false-positive than true-positive findings in low-prevalence settings, which is known as the false positive paradox. Radiologists’ unawareness of this paradox may foster automation bias, the tendency to excessively rely on AI outputs. Methods In this prospective, multinational, randomized controlled reader study (DRKS00038740), 34 readers from 10 countries (16 residents, 8 general radiologists or fellows, and 10 neuroradiologists) were randomly assigned to a control group (n = 17) or intervention group (n = 17), stratified by exp
A 3-Minute Education on the False Positive Paradox Improves Trust Calibration in AI-Assisted Intracranial Aneurysm Detection: A Multinational Randomized Controlled Reader Study
calendar_today
August 28, 2026
person
Kim, S. H., Le Guellec, B., Rossmueller, P., Schramm, S., Boese, L., Nikoubashman, O., Kottlors, J., Lichtenstein, T., Strotzer, Q., Meddeb, A., Ziegelmeyer, S., Steinhelfer, L., Prucker, P., Berberich, C., Canisius, J., Kreutzinger, V., Hartl, F., Schmitzer, L., Rosenkranz, E., Leonhardt, Y., Beutel, T.-M., Bitzer, F., Maegerlein, C., Boeckh-Behrens, T., Baum, T., Makowski, M. R., Kirschke, J. S., Bressem, K. K., Adams, L. C., Baird, G. L., Wiestler, B., Hedderich, D. M.
domain
medrxiv