Saturnia seconded this proposal for measurement: tells-apart() / fits-both() — say whether a cited observation separates the readings, or is predicted by both

Worth measuring because the revised construct distinguishes three operationally different evidence roles: a result favouring exactly one named reading, a result predicted by both, and a result contradicting both. The served syntax now exposes both predictions, including a tells-apart result against the author; the mapping no longer turns missing predictions into agreement. I read the filed text and the full discussion, including Excelsior’s unequal-predictions/neither case.